Never Mind The Bollocks…
Or: How Spec-Lit Fucked Up A Perfectly Good Word.

Punk.
Punk rock.
Punk ‘til you puke!
As a youth revolution punk was a solid fist full of fuck you! An angry, ugly, straight razor attack on the bloated excess of 1970’s pop culture.
There was punk rock music from the likes of The Sex Pistols, Black Flag, and The Dead Kennedys.
There was punk cinema in films such as Repoman, Suburbia, and The Fabulous Stains.
There was punk lit, punk art, even a punk offshoot of gonzo journalism.
It was a way of life fueled by a belief that nothing is sacred, authority is never to be trusted, and most importantly, you can always Do It Yourself…better known as the DIY ethos.
In a word, punk is rebellion.

And I know a bit about words. Word have power. Word have strength. Words are the bits of DNA from which we craft dreams and nightmares onto the page. So I’ve gotta ask my fellow wordsmiths out there, how the hell did we manage to fuck up such a great word as punk? These days it has been reduced to a toothless suffix. Four empty letters all too often stitched onto the ass-end of genre labels to make them appear edgy and new. Ecopunk, angelpunk, dieselpunk, kaleidopunk, and of course the grand right bastard of them all, steampunk. Yeah, you read that right. Steampunk. If ever a genre needed a big fist full of fuck you right now, it’s that goggle-eyed pansyfest. Why? I’ll get that in a bit. But first…

A History Lesson
Back in 1982 when author Bruce Bethke coined the term “cyberpunk” it actually meant something. It became the moniker for a clutch of rebel authors who pried sci-fi out of the cold dead hands of the classic square-jawed heroes and dragged it through the gutter. These authors didn’t just earn the punk label, they embraced it. Their prose was as much inspired by the lyrics of Lou Reed as they were by the works of William S. Burroughs and Harlan Ellison. In the dark visions of cyberpunk computers and biotech were no longer exclusively the domain of lab-coated scientists, but rather wove into the culture of back alley bars and under the flesh of the damaged loners that frequented them. Or as the granddaddy of cyberpunk, William Gibson, once put it, “The street finds its own uses for things.”

Soon after, sci-fi’s creepy uncle, the horror genre, followed suit and dug its fangs into the punk vibe as well. Called “splatterpunk,” authors like David J. Schow, Clive Barker, and George RR Martin (yes, that George RR Martin) pioneered a new breed of horror that tested the limits of violence and decency. Like the cyberpunks, these authors were true literary radicals. They pushed boundaries. Broke rules. They dared to knife into topics long believed to be “too intense” for the written word. In short, splatterpunk was a big, bloody fist full of fuck you to the traditional spook story.

Then in 1990 William Gibson collaborated with fellow cyberpunk, Bruce Sterling, on The Difference Engine. An alternate history tale, this novel envisioned a yesterday in which the computer revolution occurred during the age of steam, and thus the term “steampunk” was born. But unlike the colorful whimsy that dominates the stuff masquerading as steampunk today, the London of The Difference Engine was a Dickensian nightmare. Poverty was rampant. Technology had run amok. Skies were clogged black by smokestacks forever burning coal to power the vast gear-computers of the power elite. Now that was steampunk.

Only one of these photos is steampunk. Do you know which?

Punk, my ass!
Frankly the so-called steampunk movement of today has near to nothing in common with the world Gibson and Sterling envisioned twenty-some years ago. No, now the genre is dominated by goggles and airship and women prancing about in corsetry. These stories have no actual “punk” to them. There’s no edge, no DIY attitude, and certainly no actual rebellion in a literary sense. If anything, the new stuff is a throwback to the days of adventure pulps, or is simply high-fantasy hidden behind a brass facade of gears and pistons.

But it didn’t end with steampunk. No, soon the punk suffix was getting slapped onto everything. Got a story that features a lot of biotech? How about give it some extra zing and call it biopunk!? Does your eco-apocalypse story feature a band of hipsters watching the world die? Repackage it as ecopunk! Got an urban fantasy story with moody angles in leather jackets? Leather jackets, that’s punk right? Call it angelpunk! The list goes on and on –dieselpunk, kaleidopunk, clockpunk, nanopunk, cthulupunk, fairypunk, dinopunk, sexpunk…er…wait, that last one actually “gets” it.

What this new generation of authors (or maybe it’s reviewers and publishers) fail to grasp is that spiked hair and outrageous clothes isn’t what makes spec-lit punk. Sure, punk imagery did occasionally appear in old school cyberpunk stories, such as the Panther Moderns in Gibson’s Neuromancer. And splatterpunk had Clive Barker’s sadomasochistic bondage demons, the Cenobites. But this isn’t what made these stories punk. It was the attitude behind the prose. These authors wielded words like flaming molotov cocktails being hurled at the literary establishment. They didn’t play nice. They didn’t follow the rules. And they constantly challenged the accepted principles of genre. For example, as one reviewer once said about William Gibson, “For years sci-fi has been warning us about the dangers of technology, meanwhile Gibson’s characters are having sex with it.” Or as Sid Vicious once sang in a cover of the old Blue Eye’s classic, “I done it mmmmmmuh waaaaay!

So where do we go from here?
In the modern era the punk suffix has come to be a poor excuse for a lack of imagination. It’s the go-to term for anyone wanting to make their tired, dried up idea seem edgy and cool. What this has resulted in is dooming punk to the same fate as now empty words like “extreme” and “cthulu.” I say it’s time we give the “P” word a rest. Or at least use it damn correctly. And for all those half baked genres out there misusing the term, I have a few suggestions…

Steampunk.
For Steampunk and all it’s various spin offs, such as Dieselpunk and Clockpunk, replace the “punk” with either the word fantasy or pulp and you’re good to go. And you know what? There’s nothing to be ashamed of. Pulp has had a long, proud tradition. Why not wear the label with pride? And fantasy? Fuck, the fantasy genre has been needing a good, firm kick in the ass. Why not make that cause your own? Even better, want a cool name for your genre? The guys over at Privateer Press had the right idea when they rejected the steampunk moniker for their Iron Kingdoms game. Instead they called it “Full-Metal Fantasy.”

Biopunk.
Okay. This one is just stupid. Biotechnology has and always will be a staple of the cyberpunk genre. These stories, more often than not, are simply cyberpunk or classic cautionary tales under a different name. It’s time to call a spade a spade, alright?

Ecopunk.
Until this genre does something that actually challenges the standard conventions of the classic eco-apocalypse / dystopian tale, this genre has no business rubbing itself up against the likes of punk. You want a counterculture scene to glom onto, ecopunk? Try emo. It’s right up your alley. EcoEmo, perhaps? If the shoe fits…

Cthulupunk.
Look, in spec-lit there are few mythos so ingrained into the fabric of a genre than Lovecraft’s nightmares. Cthulu and his elder pals are about as establishment as you can get. And that’s fine. I enjoy that stuff, too. But you’re hardly going to rock the pillars of horror by borrowing from the ideas of a man whose stories have been an institution for nearly a century now. The term Lovecraftian has become a genre unto itself for a reason.

Fairypunk.
Really? Seriously? Fairypunk??? Bad ass Tinkerbells living on the edge? Look, unless you’re writing some form of homoerotic lit, which in itself can be pretty damn punk, just fuck off okay?

Dinopunk, Dragonpunk, etc.
Go to hell.

About Dr. Josh Finney

Dr. Finney is an author and sometimes artist. His titles include: Titanium Rain, Utopiates, and OBJECTIVE: Terminus. All are currently available at Amazon.com.
This entry was posted in Editorials. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Never Mind The Bollocks…
Or: How Spec-Lit Fucked Up A Perfectly Good Word.

  1. mortalez says:

    Yeah what he said, to me steampunk should read like cyberpunk just based in the late 1900’s or early 20th century. dark and ugly.

    • Guna says:

      Some groups that I like that I would not call punk but have their roots in that peiord: Pretenders, Television, Joy Division, Boomtown Rats, Cure, PIL (Public Image Limited). In my opinion, PIL’s output was much more interesting than that of the Pistols.

  2. Carl Jansson says:

    Sonic Youth is the most punk rock thing to come along in decades. From their lo-fi sound to their ethos, they exude punk rock. DIY to the extreme! The Sex Pistols were a boy band put together by Malcolm McLaren to sell clothing. Fuck the Sex Pistols. I love the Apparat series by Warren Ellis, because it embraces the idea that superheroes never existed, and pulp fantasies just continued, uninterrupted. That is comics. Or it should be.

    • admin says:

      Sonic Youth would have never existed if it were not for the legacy of the Sex Pistols, just as the Sex Pistols would’ve never have happened if it weren’t for The Who, etc, etc. etc… But since this really wasn’t an editorial about music, I’ll leave it at that.

      As for Ellis and his Apparat series…ummm…okay. I too agree with you that it is indeed something that exists and is good. And this relates because??? Uhhh…Carl, have you been drinking?

    • Cansu says:

      Punk was a strange thing. There were a lot of bands that were cealld punk that didn’t fit with the rest. I like to think of punk as an attitude more than a genre of music.To me the Clash, Sex Pistols and bands that had the same energy and as the British say, piss , are definitely inside of the punk realm, but there are many others that had distinctly different sounds that still fall within the genre.I’m sure it can be disected into an infinite number of slivers. This list changes daily for me with the exception of the core groups that others have mentioned above.I’m certain there are many I’m missing.The dead kennedysThe ClashThe Sex PistolsBlack FlagPiLThe RamonesIan DuryIggy PopGeneration XGang of FourFlipperThe Dead MilkmenThe Circle JerksBuzzcocksThe Meat puppetsOingo BoingoThe Plasmatics (Wendy O)Richard Hell and the VoidoidsStiff Little FingersThe StoogesThe UndertonesViolent FemmesXThe Butthole SurfersC-

      • Noemi says:

        The Clash and the Ramones are at the top of the pile, in my opinion. The Stooges, the Who, the New York Dolls, and Lou Reed/Velvet Underground are major inceflnues on the punk movement. Generation X and Richard Hell were good.

Leave a Reply